|5 mins||Summary of previous meeting|
Service provider 5 (and any earlier if required
|40 mins||expectations of federation operators|
Summary of previous meeting
only 6 attendees. 3 federations represented, InCommon, UKAMF and SWAMID.
last time got to SP4. any comments?
MDUI issues - logo, description (language options) how do we deal with language? legal requirements for some regions but MUST have presence
of certain values.... we can recommend what goes in
Tom explanation - data minimisation. how the required attributes required is published is not mandated (allowing it to be published
in metadata, on a federation webpage, etc)
CoCo - required/requested attributes being listed.
Do we make sure that this is not SAML specific
another SP requirement? end points. return urls secure/encrypted
revisit IdP requirements - errorURL
change IdP4 and SP4 to be more technology profile agnostic.... not so SAML
use of implementation profiles for each technology covered by an overriding Baseline expectation doc.
FO1 SWAMID agree. trust is the main thing. service availability etc is important but leads to the number 1 aim of Trustworthiness
Alan - availability of metadata can be under FO3
Tom asked Albert about a document related to trust efforts.
Richer set of documents on technical.edugain.org so that people who have issues can have a place to look (security info etc)