Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:41:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1260074045.2024.1711665698815@wiki-prod.refeds.org>
Subject: Exported From Confluence
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----=_Part_2023_1629538441.1711665698811"
------=_Part_2023_1629538441.1711665698811
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
Schema Editorial Board Notes, 9 July 2020
Schema Editorial Board Notes, 9 July 2020
Attendees<=
/h1>
Regrets
Agenda
- Agenda bash
- Review of Action Items
- 6338bis has been submitted to the IETF - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-milinovic-6338bis/. Waitin=
g to hear back from the Security Area Directors on adoption.
- Updating the Community
- Heather sent a general update about REFEDS activities which includes a =
report on the Schema Editorial Board; suggest she create one with more deta=
il for the schema-discuss list
- Sub-committee Status
- eduPersonAffiliation - meetings are happening bi-weekly. Currently work=
ing against a table of different use cases to see where we see the need for=
new affiliations, or where we need to focus on awareness of entitlements. =
So far, have rough consensus on adding researcher and sponsored (will renam=
e) to the list of affiliations. For the entitlements, we're seeing a combin=
ation of a need for general/common definitions, and local definitions that =
work as a bilateral arrangement between an IdP and SP.
- voPerson - subcommittee met a few weeks ago to go through some of the o=
pen issues for 2.0. See notes in the individual i=
ssues for details. No ETA for completion.
- Status: proposed entity categories (Consultation Page)
- Authentication Only
- Anonymous Authorization
- Pseudonymous Authorization
- To what extent should the schema board add to the public comments? Shou=
ld definitely go ahead and respond during the consultation, so comments are=
kept public. The schema board will need to meet in early September to disc=
uss results of the consultation.
- AOB
- ldap public key schema - proposal for adoption spurred by the voPerson =
work (see issue 38). The original author of th=
is schema has engaged on the issue itself with support for changes. This is=
n't actually standardized in any RFC, though it is used by the research com=
munity. The OID was originally registered by Inverse Path (now acquired by =
F-Secure). It is no longer maintained. One possibility for the schema board=
would be to adopt the schema outright, keeping it as is with an open quest=
ion fo what to do with the OID space. F-Secure is willing to re-assign the =
OID space, but we need to know if that's a technical possibility and whethe=
r REFEDS could take over ownership of that.
- Benjamin Oshrin to write up a proposal to schem=
a-discuss letting people know what's being considered re: adoption of ldap =
public key schema and ask for input
- renewed energy in the course schema. The software integration working g=
roup will be following up on this and may offer a proposal. Keith will shar=
e this to the schema-discuss list when more information is available.
- Schema board will skip August and meet again in early September; Heathe=
r will send out a doodle poll
Notes
------=_Part_2023_1629538441.1711665698811--