...
| comment # | Line/Reference # | Proposed Change or Query | Proposer / Affiliation | Action / Decision (please leave blank) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99 | Is there a reason that pairwise-id is not listed as possible user identifier (at least in addition to subject-id for IDP release, with support RECOMMENDED for SPs)? Requiring the release of a omni-directional unique user identifier that will permit direct matching between supporting sites does not seem aligned with the stated minimum disclosure principle. | ||
| 2 | 47-48 | Similarly to comment 2 on the Pseudonymous consultation, can you add a couple of words to clarify that RC2 is in the "application for inclusion in the Entity Category" | Alex Stuart (Jisc) | |
| 3 | 56-58 | Can you give an example of when a federation registrar would not remove the entity category when a Service Provider can no longer demonstrate compliance? I'd expect that the registrar MUST remove, not SHOULD. | Alex Stuart (Jisc) | |