Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TitleOIDCre federation policies
DescriptionOIDCre federations are moving into pilot phases and discussions on how to run hybrid SAML/OIDC federations are happening now. Rather than having to go back and try and normalize the policies for OIDCre federations, let's take a look at what we think the policy space should look like and create the necessary templates.
Proposer

TIIME 2018, roland@sunet.se

Resource requirements?
+1's
General Comments

NH: would suggest policy writing might sit better under eduGAIN task in GN4, although policy work has happened here before.

SURFnet: suggest gap analysis with current SAML federation policies: how much difference is there?

...

TitleFederation 2.0
Description

With OIDC federation and MDQ/per-entity upcoming, it's time to look deeply into how to operate R&E Federations in a hybrid SAML/OIDC manner. What are the Sources of Authority and what actors/orgs should assume which roles and perform which tasks to support this global trust infrastructure.

Federations have been in existence now for 15-ish years. Let's step back and take a look at whether the current model is the right model for going forward. How should R&E federations evolve?

Highly related to the OIDCre Federation Policies topic. (Discovery 2.0 from 2017 Work Items is also a piece of this - MS)

Proposer
Tom Barton
Resource requirements?
+1's


TitleEvolution of SIRTFI
DescriptionThe working group likely needs to focus on adoption of the existing SIRTFI. This work proposes to discuss how to evolve SIRTFI to include more MUSTS and otherwise react to an ever-changing security landscape.
Proposer

TIIME 2018

Resource requirements?
+1's
General Comments

NH: radical idea - make Sirtfi a MUST for eduGAIN based on GDPR requirements?

SURFnet: Good idea, but we suspect SIRTFI will need some form of profiles, to allow for differentiating for different usecases.

...

TitleService Catalogue
DescriptionDo whatever Heather recommends out of the Service Catalogue work carry over from 2017. 
ProposerNicole Harris
Resource requirements<money? effort? coordination? unicorns?>
+1's<for others to voice their support - add your name here>


TitleR&S next steps
DescriptionR&S 2.0
R&S benefits doc (should be done real soon now - this is just a reminder)
R&S certification conversation
R&S GDPR advice.
Proposer<your name here>
Resource requirements<money? effort? coordination? unicorns?>
+1'sscott.koranda@ligo.org
General CommentSURFnet: do post-mortem first, in order to take concrete steps for this activity.

...