...
| comment # | Line/Reference # | Proposed Change or Query | Proposer / Affiliation | Action / Decision (please leave blank) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | general | I think it is strange that a report on Academic Interfederation does not mentioned eduGAIN at all. This seems a significant oversight. | Nicole Harris, GÉANT | |
| 2 | 616 | The report makes a recommendation that new governance structure for federation be put in place but does not analyse or discuss why the group feels the current models are ineffective. To make this point, i feel this analysis is needed. There are many groups looking at federation - REFEDS, eduGAIN, FIM4R, FIM4L, AEGIS etc. The report does not mention them. | Nicole Harris, GÉANT | |
| 3 | 627 | "Academic Interfederation exists, but is not coordinated nor resourced as a viable and evolving infrastructure" - this statement implies that the eduGAIN infrastructure is neither resourced nor viable. This needs addressing. | Nicole Harris, GÉANT | |
| 4 | 1036 and 665 | These comments on the volunteer nature of the community seem to contradict each other. I'd also challenge the participation in REFEDS by many individuals as strictly "volunteer" as most people are participating on paid time from their organisations | Nicole Harris, GÉANT | |
| 5 | 208 | The use of "federal" and also the examples provided might lead to believe this is a US based thing, which is of cause totally not the case. Perhaps showcasing examples from around the globe would strengthen the notion this is a global effort. | Niels van Dijk, SURF | |