You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Next »

Date

Time: 15:30 CEST

Attendees

Agenda

  1. Open Actions.
  2. Review of work items and working groups.
  3. Issues with FedLab contract.
  4. Report from attributes coordination calls and R&S consultation. 
  5. Review ideas on attribute release promotion.
  6. Inputs for activities in the second half of the year.
  7. REFEDS Coordinator allocation moving forward.

 

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
Workplan update
  1. REFEDS Survey
  2. Meetings -
    1. Meeting at I2 will be very focused on 3-4 topics (one of which hopefully an SPs panel)
    2. No EWTI event - suggestion is to align it with the AARC meeting
  3. WGs - Heather helping on some WGs too.
    1. Sirtfi - running very well, Implementation on sirtfi on the table now
    2. Assurance - new WG created after TNC.
    3. FOG - keeps running well
    4. OIDC - not enough work for the WG to keep going - so maybe this should not continue in 2017
    5. IdP of last resort - working fine
    6. ORCID - a lot of discussion happening, but no concrete outputs from this WG.

 

Promotion and communication

 

IAMonline EU  - Joint effort REFEDS, AARC, GN4 to organise something similar to the US.

Libraries work - Word done in AARC, not a lot of results. Not a lot for  REFEDS to do in this space. Miro noted that the support for persistent IDs and ORCID is something revelant for federations to look at.

Cloud

Evenagelic SPs- Take the static discovery guide, refresh that and make a website where you can login in.

DNS scope verification - Not a lot of enthusiasm to move this forward.

 Services 
  1. MET
  2. REEP
  3. FedLab - A bit of a situation with this contract. Roland pulled out, so Rainer is alone now. There has been a huge delay in delivering, the founding was coming from the different sources. Main problem is about changing the directions.  The work was meant to deliver a pilot with the related documentation, but at the moment nothing has been provided. ACTION - take a step back document what is needed, and see where the deplooyment should take place.
    NH to report back on the conversation with Rainer.

 

 Standard and specs Entity categories - last call was very positive, there consensus on the next changes.

Action items

  •  
  • No labels