Date
Attendees
- Alex Stuart
- @bjornmattsson
- @christopherwhalen
- Eskil Swahn
- Jon Agland
- @meshnakoren
- Miroslav Milinović
- Pål Axelsson (HKR)
- Stephen Lovell
- Tom Barton
Goals
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
joining time | all |
| |
50min | general discussion | all | chat about doc and other things |
Notes
SRCE - Miro - email address and name are in contact information
SWAMID - Bjorn - 60% have email details, 10% phone
Alan - lets look at the joining.membership comments made from Shannon and Christopher - seems like the request is for
common document in federation path that covers the policies/rules/joining procedure etc. is this a correct summary...would
such things be onerous?
Pal - it would be good to be consistent - but can all the requirements such as membership/eligibility/subscription etc be too complex
Nicole - once did this and created a membership template. not sure how common it is
Miro - should be very short
Christopher - I just need the eligibility when interacting with an IdP the other side of the world..... quick place to check if they can
join before recommending it
Pal - worry about duplication
Alan - what if we have a resource which just links each thing to where they are currently published known?
Nicole - we always come across these issues eg with eduroam
Tom - not sure if this is a baseline thing. so many variations
Alan - was giving the idea some room to breathe to see what we can get out as it is related to the fundamental aim of
making federations easier to use, better IdP/SP interop etc.
Tom - make this a requirement for inter-federation?
Nicole - need to have a place for the eligibility etc
Meshna - my experience is they do have this information published, somewhere on the website. some similarities, answers
to the same questions but in their own different ways . for SPs starting up, hard to find whats what but with some experience
eg dealing with the 3rd or 4th federation etc it becomes easier.
Alan - so we request Federations have their doc/policies and move the linking requirements to interfederation
(general consent)
F01 disussed
F02 - needed wording change
F03 - proposal to add something about interperability
Albert shared this Doc: https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/federation/InCommon+metadata+validation+procedure
we'll start next meeting with this (Alex is going to look at UK filtering rules etc to see how they can be interpreted in similar
vein)
Action items
- Alex Stuart Alan Buxeycommonly populated contact details