This Wiki is available to view but still under maintenance. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THE WIKI UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. We are attempting to restore missing edits which took place between Monday 8 and Thursday 11 April 2019, therefore the site is likely to be taken off line at any time. Updated 20:43 CEST 16 April 2019.
Child pages
  • 2018 REFEDS Workplan
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

These are the proposed top level areas for the 2018 workplan, drawn from proposals crowdsourced in 2018. 

 

REF18-1: REFEDS Coordination and Management

Lead: Nicole Harris

Aims:

  • To progress REFEDS position as an important player within the access and identity management space internationally.  
  • To build on established relationships with GÉANT project, ISOC and Kantara. 
WORKITEMSDESCRIPTIONCOMMENTASSIGNED TOSTART DATEEND DATESTATUS                    
REF18-1AREFEDS BOFS at appropriate meetings throughout the year (maximum of 2).Suggestions for where to target BOFs in 2018 welcomedNicole Harris 01/18 12/18
REF18-1BMaintain and develop the REFEDS blog, wiki and website.

As normal.

Nicole Harris 01/18 12/18
REF18-1CREFEDS annual meetings.TNC and Internet2 Technology Exchange Meeting.Nicole Harris 01/18 10/18
REF18-1DImplement 2018 REFEDS Survey.Rolling out towards the end of the year seemed to be effective in 2017 and helps feed into the work planning.Nicole Harris 09/18 12/18
REF18-1EManage REFEDS contracts with third parties.These are contracts with external parties that support REFEDS such as Spherical Cow Consulting and RETI.Nicole Harris 01/18 07/18
REF18-1FManage REFEDS Sponsorships.Current sponsor list.Nicole Harris 12/17 01/19 

REF18-2: Specialist Working Groups

Lead: Heather Flanagan

Aim:

  • To provide infrastructure and support for evolving ideas and areas in the REFEDS community. 
WORKITEMSDESCRIPTIONASSIGNED TOSTART DATEEND DATESTATUS                    
REF18-2A

FOG: Federation Operators Group

Peter Schober with support from Nicole Harris01/201812/2018
REF18-2B

OIDC(re): OpenID Connect for Research and Education

Niels van Dijk with support from Heather Flanagan01/201812/2018Proposed addition to the charter: OIDCre federations are moving into pilot phases and discussions on how to run hybrid SAML/OIDC federations are happening now. Rather than having to go back and try and normalize the policies for OIDCre federations, let's take a look at what we think the policy space should look like and create the necessary templates.
REF18-2CSIRTFITom Barton with support from Nicole Harris01/201812/2018

 SIRTFI

Activity to investigate and report on the various ways Identity Federations have implemented incident response handling internally.

The result should provide national federations with insight on what to expect when contacting a peer, and opportunity for alignment and improvement. In addition it could support Sirtifi and eduGAIN e-Science support activities within AARC GEANT projects.

Template for federation operators.

Scoping tools to automate Sirtfi response testing and compliance.

REF18-2DIdPs of Last ResortPete Birkinshaw with support from Heather Flanagan01/201812/2018

Un-Affiliated IdP Working Group Draft Annual Report, 2017.  Need to consider how to use this in conjunction with Academia to differentiate IdPs.

Continue on work to define ways of tagging IdPs of Last Resort and defining a specification for minimum requirements of such an IdP within federation environment.


REF18-2EAssuranceMikael Linden with support from Heather Flanagan01/201812/2018

Work progressing well, second round of consultation planned.  MFA profile in place, work on single factor / good entropy expected.

Various work has been put into better defining the baseline requirements for activity in federations - including via InCommon and the REFEDS assurance group.  This work will look to operationalise this work in the context of existing federations and eduGAIN.

Work is underway on baseline expectations for IdPs and an Assurance Wireframe.  The assurance working group will continue in 2017. The intention is to expose the assurance profile to a community consultation until end of March and then update the assurance profile and publish it as an AARC deliverable. After that, in AARC2, we probably need to have a small pilot before it can be rolled out. 

REF18-2FEntity Category SupportNicole Harris01/201812/2018

Conduct a post-mortem for entity categories in general.

Work for REFEDS R&S next steps: R&S2, affiliation, academia

Abstract attributes

 - define approaches to abstract attributes to allow groups of attributes to be used.

 - feed into proposals to produce guidelines on attribute release for edugain.

 - create registry of attributes if appropriate.

Exchanging entity attributes outside of those with global definitions (e.g. R&S, Sirtfi etc) creates a potential for mounting conflict; part of handling this is orchestration and handling. There may also be tags that are defined within a federation, but not cross federation. This creates a vocabulary control challenge. Who handles the responsibilities among the fed ops to consider this and does this need managing? This work area will initially focus on discussion here (best practice), clarifying use cases and create a matrix to inform the discussion.  Recommendations on future steps to support this (including potential registries, rules for stripping using MDQ etc.) will be made.

The existing identifier complexity is maddening. Possibly push for adoption of the Subject-ID spec everywhere an identifier is needed, to reduce complexity for all involved going forward. Replaces eduPersonTargetedID, SAML 2.0 persistent NameID, eduPersonUniqueID and (partially) eduPersonPrincipalName. Might help align with private/public identifiers in OIDC.

REF18-2G

Federation Trust 2.0

TBATBATBA

Design, resource, and deploy a global metadata distribution infrastructure for both per-entity and aggregate metadata serving needs, for all federations to use, at global scale.

Per-entity metadata and dynamic federation ideas force a rethinking of how Federations Operators signify their validation or endorsement of certain metadata statements, and consequently a rethinking of much of the process of operating a federation. Deliverables:

  1. Define workflows that endow trust in dynamic federation metadata, ie, work out operational aspects of Roland's paper.
  2. Define an architecture or design in which it is easy for each recipient to validate dynamic metadata.
  3. List ramifications for standard federation operating procedures in a dynamic metadata environment.

REF18-3: Promotion and Communication

Lead: Nicole Harris

Aims:

  • To provide materials and support mechanisms to help federations promote effective approaches to IdPs and SPs.
  • To provide feedback on documents produced by other groups to support clarity of messages.
  • To reach out to target groups where specific messaging could be beneficial.
WORKITEMSDESCRIPTIONASSIGNED TOSTART DATEEND DATESTATUS                    
REF18-3APromotional material and support for entity categories

Nicole Harris

 

 04/201809/2018  R&S pages updated.  Still an outstanding need for a benefits doc to be hosted at: https://refeds.org/research-and-scholarship.
REF18-3B

REFEDS Discovery Guide, Mark 2

Consent is used often within identity federations. While on a national level it may be clear what asking and giving consent entails, unfortunately consent does not mean the same thing in various countries as the legal grounds for consent vary. Also there are many ways to implement consent. What makes a good consent page and what does not? When is it (not)   user friendly, what should be shown to make it legally usable? What are the best practices around consent globally?

This activity investigates what it means to ask and give consent in various countries. In addition it describes recommendations for 'good' and 'bad' consent pages similar to the REFEDS Discovery Guide.

Include note on how hub and spoke federations manage discovery.

Heather Flanagan TBA TBA Work postponed until RA21 pilots are completed.
REF18-3C

Publisher engagement

It is proposed that concerted effort continue in 2018 to engage publisher groups and tackle some of the wider problems in the publisher space.  This will be in coordination with the "RA21" group.

Heather Flanagan 08/2018 07/2018 Tracked via Heather's engagement with RA21.
REF18-3DTwo-pager for SPsGÉANT TBA TBA 
REF18-3E

Service Catalogue definition

Various proposals have been made to create a federation service catalogue, most recently at ACAMP: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GHerhDYfwlgjN5-pQEryJF0RqOp7R_tWuHiuW5gTdjQ.  This work will focus on defining staged requirement sets for a service catalogue and make recommendations as to how to implement such a service and where this should be hosted.

Heather Flanagan 02/2018 07/2018 Report is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P6bCZusitj3aOCtaKw7B1WwB96aSpr7ZtSqINrRjnac/edit?usp=sharing.  Next step is to finalise as a white paper.  

REF18-4: Standards and Specifications

Lead: Heather Flanagan

Aims:

  • To provide support for the development of standards and specifications under the REFEDS banner.
  • To pilot specification work to support implementation requirements.
  • To put in place structures to ensure specification and schema sustainability.
WORKITEMSDESCRIPTIONASSIGNED TOSTART DATEEND DATESTATUS                    
REF18-4A

eduPerson / SCHAC liaison
 - Work on adding new values to eduPerson (pre-attendance).

Heather Flanagan 01/2018 12/2018 Monitoring, editorial board, response to proposals
REF18-4BREFEDS RFC ProcessHeather Flanagan 01/2018 12/2018 Awaiting publication of first RFC!

REF18-5: REFEDS Services

Lead: Nicole Harris

Aims:.

  • To continue using MET and enhance where possible.
  • To support the basic REFEDS infrastructure needs (website, wiki and mailing lists). 
WORKITEMSDESCRIPTIONASSIGNED TOSTART DATEEND DATESTATUS                    
REF18-5A

MET

Contract in place with GARR for central operations.  Development work to be contracted to RETI (Andrea).

New features added and delivered in Oct.

Contractor 01/2018 12/2018 
REF18-5B

REEP/PEER

Evaluate service and determine what, if any changes are required to maintain

Licia Florio01/201812/2018Outstanding decision on EOL.

 

 

 

  • No labels