Versions Compared
Key
- This line was added.
- This line was removed.
- Formatting was changed.
- why outreach
to whom- chicken and egg: scenario planning advises, we chose scenariop planning because out reach valuable
- future of federations tied to future of academia and research
- difficulty in determining the limit of federations - whose needs are included and whose are not - resear
- developing the questions
- survey process document
- Ideally doing structured but open interviews, and a turned to the process of
- Seven questions [1] J. Ratcliffe, “Scenario planning: strategic interviews and conversations,” Foresight, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19–30, Feb. 2002.
- Used that to inform the questionaire
- result qualitative data but rich
- inviting participation
- imits of the working group
- resulting participants
CACTI 2019-04-30 Tom Barton shared more details about what we are doing to assist CACTI in outreach on our behalf
CASC 2019-04-25 Tom Barton asked a participant to forward to list
CNI Cliff Lynch has responded to written survey
FIM4R 2019-04-25 Tom Barton
Highwire Press has responded to written survey
Incommon Participants list 2019-04025 Tom Barton
Incommon TAC 2019-04-2X Judith Bush
REFEDS 2019-04025 Tom Barton
- survey process
- interview process
Raw notes
Identification of constituencies
Create first pass at list of constituencies, lists, meetings, individuals we’d like to reach for their input
Developing the questions
3/2/19've not yet found examples of survey questions, but i am finding a common set of recommendations for structuring interviews. I've found a number of variations on "the seven questions". Included below is the list provided in Scenario planning: strategic interviews and conversations
The ``seven-questions'' approach. This originates in the work of the Institute of the Future (Amara and Lipinski,1983), and has successively been refined by Shell (Schwartz, 1991), van der Heijden (1996) and ICL (Ringland, 1998). In essence, it comprises a set of questions, which have been adapted by the researcher generically to read:
- If you could pose three questions to a clairvoyant who can foretell the future, what would you ask?
- In the best possible world what would you hope for?
- In the worst possible world what are your greatest fears?
- What pivotal events from the past few years provide good lessons for the future?
- What major decisions with long-term implications are faced at the moment?
- What major constraints do you experience inside/outside the organisation/system?
- If all constraints were removed, and you could direct what is done, what would you do?
(There are other variants such as ``What is your best dream?'', ``What is your worst nightmare?'' and ``What keeps you up at night?''.)
To see how these are adapted, slide 7 of this presentation shows one organization's refinements:
Survey process
Various platforms were considered. Google docs despite flaws
Interview process
recordings for 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,
UTC date | Participants | Link to Google doc | Notes made during the conversation | ||||||
M 4/29 | Leif Johansson | Notes |
| ||||||
T 4/30 | Don Hamparian | Notes |
| ||||||
W 5/1 | |||||||||
W 5/8 | |||||||||
W 5/8 | |||||||||
M 5/13 | |||||||||
T 5/14 |
Original documents were hosted in the Google drive folder share by the working group:
Survey process document |
| ||||||
| |||||||
Survey |
| ||||||
Interview script |
|